Analysis of compost repair mortars by vinylic copolymer, PVA, and SBR

Mateus Henrique de Souza, Rafael Alves de Souza

Abstract


This work aimed to develop and analyze polymeric repair mortars composed of either  vinylic copolymer, PVA (polyvinyl acetate), and or SBR (styrene-butadiene ). Tests were carried out to determine the compressive and diametral compression tensile strengths. In addition, the adhesive strength between the repair and the concrete was determined by means of a diametral compression traction test. Among the materials tested, it was noticed that the material modified by styrene-butadiene SBR hadexhibited the best performance, especially with respect to theits adhesion to the concrete. In general, the results showed that the mortars modified by the studied polymers can meet the function of a repair material

Keywords


repair, polymer mortar, pathological manifestations, repair mortar, adhesion strength

References


Alanazi, H., Yang, M., Zhang, D., Gao, Z. (2016), Bond strength of PCC pavement repairs using metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar. Cement and Concrete Composites. 65: 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.10.009

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (2011) NBR 7222: Concreto e argamassa — Determinação da resistência à tração por compressão diametral de corpos de prova cilíndricos. Rio de Janeiro.

Espeche, A. D., León, J. (2011), Estimation of bond strength envelopes for old-to-new concrete interfaces based on a cylinder splitting test. Construction and Building Materials. 25: 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.032

Geiker, M. R. (2012), On the importance of execution for obtaining the designed durability of reinforced concrete structures: Construction of durable concrete structures. Materials and corrosión. 63:1114 -1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201206754

Helene, P. R. D. L. (1992), “Manual para reparo, reforço e proteção de Estruturas de Concreto”. PINI, São Paulo, Brasil.

Luković, M., Ye, G., Van Breugel, K. (2012), “Reliable concrete repair: A critical review”. 14th International Conference Structural Faults and Repair. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Radhakrishnan, R., Syam Prakash, V., Prasad Varma Thampan, C. K. (2012), Performance of Styrene Butadiene Rubber as a Concrete Repair Material in tropical climate. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, Volume 1, Issue 6, pp. 1-5, ISSN 2278-7763

Soufi, A., Mahieux, P. Y., Ait-Mokhtar, A. (2016), Influence of polymer proportion on transfer properties of repair mortars having equivalent water porosity. Materials and Structures. 49: 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0504-3

Souza, V. C. M. D., Ripper, T. (1998), “Patologia, Recuperação e Reforço de Estruturas de Concreto”. PINI, São Paulo, Brasil.

Sprinkel, M. M., Ozyildirim, C. (2000), Evaluation of high performance concrete overlays placed on Route 60 over Lynnhaven Inlet in Virginia. Charlottesville, EUA.

Ueda, H., Tamai, Y., Kudo, T. (2011), Evaluation of the Durability of Cement-based Repair Materials. Railway Technical Research Institute. 52: 92-96. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.52.92

Ukrainczyk, N., Rogina, A. (2013), Styrene–butadiene latex modified calcium aluminate cement mortar. Cement & Concrete Composites. 41: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.04.012




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21041/ra.v9i3.330

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Reservation of rights for exclusive use No.04-2013-011717330300-203  e-ISSN: 2007-6835. Revista ALCONPAT, Copyright © 2011 - 2017