A systematic review of Building Performance Evaluation criterias (BPE)
Abstract
The objective of this article is to provide, through a systematic review of the literature, focused on the quality control of buildings, a database to present the Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) most used criteria. Through this review, 782 articles were identified, of which 15 were selected considering the subject's adherence to the research and publication period. It was discussed the main information about the articles, their authors and journals. The performance criteria compiled by the analyzed articles used as basis: literature, questionnaires and interviews with users and professionals of the area, consultation with specialists in the segment and technical visits to buildings. With these identified criteria, it was possible to define 9 dimensions of analysis that are presented and discussed in this document.
Downloads
References
Biernacki, P.; Waldorf, D. (1981), “Snowball Sampling: problems and technique of chain referral sampling”. Sociological Methods & Research, v.10, n.2, p.141-163.
Elyna Myeda, N., Nizam Kamaruzzaman, S., & Pitt, M. (2011), “Measuring the performance of office buildings maintenance management in Malaysia”. Journal of Facilities Management, 9(3), 181-199.
Gopikrishnan, S., & Topkar, V. M. (2015), “Attributes and descriptors for building performance evaluation”. HBRC Journal.
Hashim, A. E., Aksah, H., & Said, S. Y. (2012). “Functional assessment through post occupancy review on refurbished historical public building in Kuala Lumpur”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 330-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.231.
Ibem, E. O., Opoko, A. P., Adeboye, A. B., & Amole, D. (2013), “Performance evaluation of residential buildings in public housing estates in Ogun State, Nigeria: Users' satisfaction perspective”. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(2), 178-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2013.02.001.
Khan, S., & Kotharkar, R. (2012), “Performance evaluation of school environs: Evolving an appropriate methodology building”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 479-491. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.052.
Khalil, N. A. H. Nawawi. (2008), “Performance assessment of government and public buildings via post occupancy evaluation”. J. Asian School Sci. 4 (9)103–112.
Khalil, N., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Baharum, M. R. (2016), “Ranking the indicators of building performance and the users’ risk via Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): case of Malaysia”. Ecological Indicators, 71, 567-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.032.
Kim, S., Yang, I., Yeo, M., Kim, K. (2005), “Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multifamily residential building in Korea”. J. Build. Environ. 40,1103–1116.
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., BUDGEN, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, J. (2009), “Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: a systematic literature review”. Information and Software Technology, v. 51, n. 1, p. 7-15.
Koleoso, H., Omirin, M., Adewunmi, Y., & Babawale, G. (2013), “Applicability of existing performance evaluation tools and concepts to the Nigerian facilities management practice”. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 17(4), 361-376. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.861367.
Lai, J. H., & Man, C. S. (2017), “Developing a performance evaluation scheme for engineering facilities in commercial buildings: state-of-the-art review”. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 21(1), 41-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1247304.
Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., & Dixit, M. K. (2010), “Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature”. Facilities, 28(9/10), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011057189.
Støre-Valen, M., & Lohne, J. (2016), “Analysis of assessment methodologies suitable for building performance”. Facilities, 34(13/14), 726-747.: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2014-0103
Mohit, M. A., & Azim, M. (2012), “Assessment of residential satisfaction with public housing in Hulhumale’, Maldives”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 756-770. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.078.
Meir, I. A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., Cicelsky, A. (2009), “Post-occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability”. Advances In Building Energy Research 3, 189–220.
Meng, X., & Minogue, M. (2011), “Performance measurement models in facility management: a comparative study”. Facilities, 29(11/12), 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111157141.
Nazeer, S. F; De Silva, N. (2016), “TBPE scoring framework for tropical buildings”. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 6 Issue: 2, pp.174-186, https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2014-0049.
Nik-Mat, N. E. M., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Pitt, M. (2011), “Assessing the maintenance aspect of facilities management through a performance measurement system: A Malaysian case study”. Procedia Engineering, 20, 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.174.
Preiser, W. F. E. (1994), “Built environment evaluation: conceptual basis, benefits and uses”. J. Archit. Plann. Res. 11, 91–107.
Steinke, C., Webster, L., & Fontaine, M. (2010), “Evaluating building performance in healthcare facilities: an organizational perspective”. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(2), 63-83.
Talib, Y., Yang, R. J. Priyadarsini Rajagopalan. (2013), “Evaluation of building performance for strategic facilities management in healthcare: A case study of a public hospital in Australia”. Facilities, Vol. 31 Issue: 13/14, pp.681-701, https://doi.org/10.1108/f-06-2012-0042.
Teicholz, E. (2003), “Rationale and challenge”. In: Teicholz, E. (Ed.), Facility design and management handbook, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Vischer, J. C. (2008), “Towards a user centred theory of built environment”. J. Build. Res. Inform. 36 (3) 231–240.
_______________________________
License in effect from September 2020
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
Articles published in Revista Alconpat will be Open-Access articles distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The copyright is retained by the author(s). Revista Alconpat will insert the following note at the end of the published text:
“Copyright 2021 by the authors. This work is an Open-Access article published under the terms and conditions of an International Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)”.
You are free to:
|
 |
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
____________________
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
____________________
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
.png)
