Reliability-based calibration of fatigue load factors for steel bridges under traffic growth uncertainty.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v16i3.1054Keywords:
fatigue, reliability, load factor, traffic growth, steel bridgeAbstract
A reliability-based calibration of the fatigue load factor was performed as a case study for a Mexican steel bridge (Puente Calapa). Empirical Mexican axle-weight distributions gave stresses, processed by rainflow counting, Palmgren-Miner damage accumulation, and Monte Carlo evaluation of a probabilistic limit state. For 2.5%/year growth over 75 years, the Eurocode bilinear S-N curve yielded factors of 1.34 (β=1.0) and 0.70 (β=3.0). The analysis is conditional on a single bridge and idealized structural model. The study's originality lies in making the annual traffic growth rate an explicit calibration input rather than an implicit assumption. Growth rate emerged as the dominant uncertainty, shifting the reliability index by 6.5 units across the examined range and supporting its explicit formulation in code calibration.
Downloads
References
AASHTO. (2024), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. ISBN: 978-1-56051-828-0
ASTM International. (2017), ASTM E1049-85 Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1049-85R17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/E1049-85R17
Avendaño, A., Gómez-Soberón, M., Perea, T. (2013), Evaluación elástica simplificada por fatiga de un puente de acero tipo ortotrópico bajo cargas móviles típicas de México. XIX Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Sísmica, Boca del Río, Veracruz, México. Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniería Sísmica.
Berwick, B. (2012), Calibrating the steel-members fatigue limit states of the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, PhD thesis, University of Delaware. Recuperado en abril de 2026 de http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/12642
Bowman, M. D., Fu, G., Zhou, Y. E., Connor, R. J., Godbole, A. A. (2012), Fatigue evaluation of steel bridges (NCHRP Report 721). Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. ISBN: 978-0-309-25826-5. https://doi.org/10.17226/22774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/22774
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2005), Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures — Part 1-9: Fatigue (EN 1993-1-9). CEN, Brussels.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2006), Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures — Part 2: Steel bridges (EN 1993-2). CEN, Brussels.
D'Angelo, L., Nussbaumer, A. (2017), New framework for calibration of partial safety factors for fatigue design. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 139:466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2017.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.10.006
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). (2017), NOM-012-SCT-2-2017, Sobre el peso y dimensiones máximas con los que pueden circular los vehículos de autotransporte que transitan en las vías generales de comunicación de jurisdicción federal. Recuperado en junio de 2026 de https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5508944
García-Soto, A. D., Hernández-Martínez, A., Valdés-Vázquez, J. G. (2015), Probabilistic assessment of a design truck model and live load factor from weigh-in-motion data for Mexican Highway bridge design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42(11). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0216
Google Earth. (2026, agosto 5), [Imagen satelital de 18°09'46.73"N 97°15'35.07"W]. Recuperado de https://earth.google.com/
IMT (Instituto Mexicano del Transporte). (2016), Estudio de Origen–Destino y Peso, Estación PC Tehuacán, Carretera Cuacnopalan–Oaxaca (Cuota), km 40+850. Estudio Estadístico de Campo del Autotransporte Nacional (EECAN), Coordinación de Seguridad y Operación del Transporte. Campaña del 31 mayo hasta 03 junio 2016. Archivo: 357PcTehuacan.DBF. Recuperado en mayo de 2026 de https://www.gob.mx/imt/articulos/estudio-estadistico-de-campo-del-autotransporte-nacional
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). (2011), JCSS Probabilistic Model Code, Part 3.12: Fatigue Models for Metallic Structures. Recuperado en junio 2026 de https://www.jcss-lc.org/publications/jcsspmc/JCSS-3-12-Fatigue.pdf
Johnson, C., Rakoczy, A., Otter, D., Dick, S. (2020), Comparison of continuous spans versus simply supported spans (Technology Digest TD20-024). Transportation Technology Center, Inc., Pueblo, CO. Recuperado en mayo de 2026 de https://www.mxvrail.com/technology-digest/comparison-of-continuous-spans-versus-simply-support-spans/
Kwon, K., Frangopol, D. M. (2010), Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data. International Journal of Fatigue, 32(8):1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002
Matsuishi, M., Endo, T. (1968), Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress. Proceedings of the Kyushu District Meeting, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuoka, Japan. Recuperado en mayo de 2026 de https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Fatigue-of-metals-subjected-to-varying-stress-Matsuichi-Endo/467c88ec1feaa61400ab05fbe8b9f69046e59260
Meneses Rojas, L. A. (2026), Metodología de estimación de confiabilidad de fatiga por daño acumulado en puentes vehiculares bajo carga cíclica, MSc thesis, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
Miner, M. A. (1945), Cumulative Damage in Fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12(3):A159–A164. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458
Moses, F., Schilling, C. G., Raju, K. S. (1987), Fatigue evaluation procedures for steel bridges. NCHRP Report 299. Recuperado en abril de 2026 de https://trid.trb.org/View/282602, ISSN: 0077-5614
Nowak, A. S. (1999), Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code (NCHRP Report 368) Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. ISSN 0077-5614
SCT (Secretaría de Infraestructura, Comunicaciones y Transportes). (s.f.), Datos Viales. Recuperado en abril de 2026 de https://micrs.sct.gob.mx/infraestructura/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/
Sørensen, J. D. (2012), Reliability-based calibration of fatigue safety factors for offshore wind turbines. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 22(3):234–241.
Suarez, J. (2025), Puente Calapa, una peligrosa ruta entre Puebla y Oaxaca—El Sol de Puebla. El Sol de Puebla. Recuperado en agosto de 2026 de https://oem.com.mx/elsoldepuebla/local/puente-calapa-una-peligrosa-ruta-entre-puebla-y-oaxaca-23407734
TRB (Transportation Research Board and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2014), Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/22441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/22441
Wirsching, P. H. (1984), Fatigue Reliability for Offshore Structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 110(10), 2340–2356. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:10(2340) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:10(2340)
Zhang, M., Wang, X., Li, Y. (2024), Fatigue Reliability Assessment of Bridges Under Heavy Traffic Loading Scenario. Infrastructures, 9(12):238. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9120238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9120238
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Barragán González, E., Rangel Ramírez, J. G.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
_______________________________
License in effect from September 2020
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
.png)
